Civil War Interactive Discussion Board Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register


What was Hill & Heth trying to Prove? - Battle of Gettysburg - Civil War Talk - Civil War Interactive Discussion Board
 Moderated by: javal1
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Wed Sep 10th, 2008 05:58 pm
  PMQuoteReply
1st Post
5fish
Member


Joined: Sun Jul 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 109
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
On June 30th. 1863, Gen. Pettigrew approached Gettysburgs with his Brigade. Once, he learned that union cavalry was occupying the town. He choose to turn back to avoid an engagement.

On the night of the 30th of June 1863, Gen. Hill, Gen. Heth and Gen. Pettigrew discussed what was saw earlier in the day at Gettysburg. Gen. Hill dismissed there being union cavalry at Gettysburg instead it must have been local militia. Gen, Heth decided he would send his whole Division into Gettysburg on July 1st. Gen. Hill did not object to Gen Heth plan.

My Point:

Gen. Hill's dismissal of union cavalry at Gettysburg set the stage for the Battle of Gettysburg.

Gen Heth plan to take his whole division into Gettysburg must mean he did not fully dismiss Gen. Pettigrew belief that union cavalry not militia was in Gettysburg.

Note Gen. Heth was planing for a fight at Gettysburg on the morning of July 1st. When his division ran into heavy fire they did not retire as of Lee's orders. He had already chose to fight that day.

Gen. Heth and Gen. Hill knew they were going to engaged a union force at Gettysburg on the morning of Jule 1st..

The Battle of Gettysburg was started by these two generals because they did not fully trust Gen. Pettigrew opinion.

Gen. Heth and Gen. Hill set the corner stone for Lee's great defeat because their desire to prove a non west point man wrong or prove a junior officer wrong..?? What was Gen. Hill and gen. Heth trying to prove??


Something to ponder....

Back To Top


 Posted: Fri Sep 12th, 2008 12:11 pm
  PMQuoteReply
2nd Post
gettysburgerrn
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 8th, 2007
Location: Masapequa, Ny, USA
Posts: 133
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I don't think it was a personal matter of trying to prove Pettigrew wrong. Rather I think it was a matter of not fully appreciating his opinion and thinking he was overstating the matter. As far as they thought this was militia who was going to run like they did against Early a few days prior...or the alternative theory (which I think may be more accurate) is that they took the matters under advisement but they sent enough force (2 divisions, heth and pender, plus artillery) to deal with what they thought was in front of them, with no realization that significant infantry elements of the AoP were that close. Its funny though, the only command decison that Hill made during the battle is the one that started it.

ken

Back To Top


 Posted: Sun Sep 14th, 2008 03:18 pm
  PMQuoteReply
3rd Post
5fish
Member


Joined: Sun Jul 13th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 109
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
True, I never thought about but Hill's one decision led to the battle of Gettysburg. he had little or no role during the battle but can claim he brought it forth..

 

 

Back To Top


 Posted: Sun Nov 23rd, 2008 11:00 am
  PMQuoteReply
4th Post
gettysburgerrn
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 8th, 2007
Location: Masapequa, Ny, USA
Posts: 133
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
What happened to Dick Anderson on day 2 anyway? not an impressiv performance... Actually Not a good day for 3rd corp division commmanders generally..Anderson a non factor, Pender gets mortally wounded and Hill still has one hell of a headache...
ken

Back To Top


 Posted: Sun Nov 23rd, 2008 10:13 pm
  PMQuoteReply
5th Post
Old Blu
Member
 

Joined: Tue Sep 16th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 89
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
5fish wrote: On June 30th. 1863, Gen. Pettigrew approached Gettysburgs with his Brigade. Once, he learned that union cavalry was occupying the town. He choose to turn back to avoid an engagement.

On the night of the 30th of June 1863, Gen. Hill, Gen. Heth and Gen. Pettigrew discussed what was saw earlier in the day at Gettysburg. Gen. Hill dismissed there being union cavalry at Gettysburg instead it must have been local militia. Gen, Heth decided he would send his whole Division into Gettysburg on July 1st. Gen. Hill did not object to Gen Heth plan.

My Point:

Gen. Hill's dismissal of union cavalry at Gettysburg set the stage for the Battle of Gettysburg.

Gen Heth plan to take his whole division into Gettysburg must mean he did not fully dismiss Gen. Pettigrew belief that union cavalry not militia was in Gettysburg.

Note Gen. Heth was planing for a fight at Gettysburg on the morning of July 1st. When his division ran into heavy fire they did not retire as of Lee's orders. He had already chose to fight that day.

Gen. Heth and Gen. Hill knew they were going to engaged a union force at Gettysburg on the morning of Jule 1st..

The Battle of Gettysburg was started by these two generals because they did not fully trust Gen. Pettigrew opinion.

Gen. Heth and Gen. Hill set the corner stone for Lee's great defeat because their desire to prove a non west point man wrong or prove a junior officer wrong..?? What was Gen. Hill and gen. Heth trying to prove??


Something to ponder...."


Last edited on Sun Nov 23rd, 2008 10:14 pm by Old Blu

Back To Top


 Posted: Sun Nov 23rd, 2008 10:16 pm
  PMQuoteReply
6th Post
Old Blu
Member
 

Joined: Tue Sep 16th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 89
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Something happened when I tried to quote your post.

Here is my response.

Ain't too much to ponder.  Hill was sick and should have been relieved of duties.  I personally feel Hill lost the war for General Lee.

Back To Top


 Posted: Mon Nov 24th, 2008 01:19 am
  PMQuoteReply
7th Post
Doc C
Member


Joined: Sun Oct 1st, 2006
Location:  Eastern Shore, Maryland USA
Posts: 800
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Hill didn't get along with many people, i.e. Longstreet, Jackson, Anderson. There are opinions that Hill didn't release Mahone's brigade for the July 2nd assault b/o his dislike of Anderson/Longstreet. Not that Mahone's brigade would have aided Wilcox/Posey's assault. Hill was an essentially a nonfactor at Gettysburg, imho.

Doc C

Last edited on Mon Nov 24th, 2008 01:19 am by Doc C

Back To Top


 Posted: Mon Nov 24th, 2008 02:32 am
  PMQuoteReply
8th Post
Old Blu
Member
 

Joined: Tue Sep 16th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 89
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
The first day, Ewell asked for help before attempting to assault Cemetery Hill and %%#@&*^% Hill talked Lee out of it.

Last edited on Mon Nov 24th, 2008 02:33 am by Old Blu

Back To Top


 Posted: Mon Nov 24th, 2008 05:58 pm
  PMQuoteReply
9th Post
HankC
Member


Joined: Tue Sep 6th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 299
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
IIRC, Lee wanted a concentration at Gettysburg but ordered that no one bring on a general engagement.

Your mileage may vary, but few infantry officers are going to concede a fight with cavalry as a general engagment...

Blu, IIRC, it was Early that disagreed most with an evening assault on the hill...


HankC

Back To Top


 Posted: Mon Nov 24th, 2008 07:09 pm
  PMQuoteReply
10th Post
Old Blu
Member
 

Joined: Tue Sep 16th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 89
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
There was also a few of Ewell's men who tried to get him to let their brigade attack and he wouldn't do it.  Hill had a meeting with Lee and talked him out of reinforcements to Ewell. Plenty of daylight left to wrap it up.  This info is in the book "Lee's last chance for Victory."

Back To Top


 Posted: Fri Nov 28th, 2008 09:34 pm
  PMQuoteReply
11th Post
gettysburgerrn
Member


Joined: Thu Mar 8th, 2007
Location: Masapequa, Ny, USA
Posts: 133
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
IIRC Hill let his 2 divisions lead with a batallion of artillery...Im thinking if he was expecting something lessthan a general engagement why would he bring so much firepower with him for a mere reconnaisance?


KEn

Back To Top



 Current time is 12:33 pm

Top



UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.2582 seconds (21% database + 79% PHP). 25 queries executed.