Civil War Interactive Discussion Board Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register


 Moderated by: javal1 Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2   
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Hood's Performance at Nashville  Rating:  Rating
AuthorPost
 Posted: Fri Sep 26th, 2008 03:15 pm
  PM Quote Reply
21st Post
ole
Member


Joined: Sun Oct 22nd, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 2027
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
....much less the commander of an army in the field
Agree totally with everything you said, Mike, except this snippet -- although I do mostly agree.  In a fight, there were few better than John Bell at maneuvering into and directing it.

However, you did say "army," and here is where I agree. He was totally unsuited for all those things required of army commanders. For example, it would appear that at Spring Hill, Schofield was let pass because his commanders did not (did not dare?) throw troops across the road -- a SNAFU of major consequences. Would any other commander have gone to bed with such a providential opportunity in his grasp? Would any other commander have subordinates who were afraid (or reluctant?) to act?

Just this one piece of evidence supports your conclusion: he was in way over his head.

ole

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

Current time is 05:46 pm Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2     
Civil War Interactive Discussion Board > The Participants of the War - Mikitary & Civilian > John Bell Hood > Hood's Performance at Nashville Top



Lead Theme By: Di @ UltraBB
UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.1602 seconds (16% database + 84% PHP). 25 queries executed.