 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
Member
| Joined: | Sun Oct 22nd, 2006 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 2027 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Maybe we ought to stick with Cold Harbor?
ole
Last edited on Fri Feb 8th, 2008 06:50 am by ole
| View single post by ole | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Feb 8th, 2008 06:44 am |
|
||||||||||||
|
ole Member
|
Is what I meant by "nit-picking" Bama. We can argue it forever while neither of us much cares and there will be no conclusion. THE army, under Smith, Grant or Halleck was on an offensive drive (well, maybe drive is too strong) toward Corinth. In the end game, we can agree that Grant fought a defensive action, but it was a jink in an offensive action which did, ultimately, end in taking Corinth. Maybe we ought to stick with Cold Harbor? ole Last edited on Fri Feb 8th, 2008 06:50 am by ole |
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||