 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
Member
| Joined: | Thu Apr 10th, 2008 |
| Location: | Aurora, Colorado |
| Posts: | 311 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
| View single post by TimK | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Jun 19th, 2008 04:02 pm |
|
||||||||||||
|
TimK Member
|
Okay - as lifl2003 pointed out, as far as I can tell it seems to be a geographical thing. But here's another question. It has been pointed out that Lincoln did whatever was necessary to keep the United States united - some legal, some not so much. Does the dislike of Lincoln come from the way he went about things, or from the fact that he refused secession? Does anybody still believe that after 150 years, two world wars, and several "conflicts", that two separate countries would be a good thing?
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||