 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
Grumpy Geezer
| Joined: | Thu Sep 1st, 2005 |
| Location: | Tennessee USA |
| Posts: | 1491 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |   |
| View single post by javal1 | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Sep 20th, 2008 12:01 am |
|
||||||||||||
|
javal1 Grumpy Geezer
|
Good questions Pam. Wish I had an answer, but this thread was a stark reminder how litle I know about the batle. That seems to be a consensus. So if I may add a few more questions to yours - why do so few people study this particular battle? Is it that sieges are just less "romantic" or "exciting" then straight-out batles? Or that many think it was too late in the war to change anything? Or maybe the strategic importance isn't well known or understood? Curious to hear opinions.
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||