 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
Member
| Joined: | Sun Dec 12th, 2010 |
| Location: | Indiana USA |
| Posts: | 236 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
.
| View single post by BHR62 | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Nov 5th, 2011 12:12 pm |
|
||||||||||||
|
BHR62 Member
|
I've always wondered about how the Battle of Gettysburg would have gone if Hooker stays in command of the Army of the Potomac. So I ask you my panel of experts, does it play out the same way? Hooker was more aggressive I believe than Meade. But the high ground of Gettysburg was so strong does he stay on defense? Would he have pursued Lee more aggressively afterwards? Hooker was a very capable general. Although he had a tendency of stabbing his superiors in the back. Anyway just curious to everyones thoughts on Hooker at Gettysburg. .
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||