View single post by Hellcat
 Posted: Fri Apr 5th, 2013 01:48 am
 PM  Quote  Reply  Full Topic 
Root Beer Lover

Joined: Tue Nov 15th, 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 981

  back to top

I make that you have little care for Jackson and more care for some of the more succesful Federal generals towards the end of the war. I don't think Sheridan would have destroyed Jackson, but at the same time I don't think Jackson would have destroyed Sheridan either. By the time Sheridan reached the Valley the war was largely going towards the North's favor and more and more Federal troops were being brought east as the Western Theater was moving east. Sheridan had more forces to throw at Early in the Valley than previous Federal generals had had to throw against Jackson. First Winchester Jackson actually has more than twice Banks' force to play with. Third Winchester Sheridan has more than twice Early's force. Sheridan had the numbers on his side and yet he still approached facing Early in the beginning of the campaign with caution according to Bruce Catton in The Civil War. Catton describes Early on page 226 as

a hard hitter, and although his army was small, it was lean and sinewy, composed of veterans -- altogether, an outfit to be treated with much respect.

Jackson had gained his reputation not just against smaller forces. According to Encyclopedia of the American Civil War Jackson once said the reason he had been succesful was to

Always mystify, mislead and surprise the enemy, if possible; and when you strike and overcome him, never let up in the pursuit so long as your men have the strength to follow; for an army routed, if hotly pursued, becomes panic-stricken, and can then be destroyed by half their number. The other rule is, never fight against heavy odds, if by any possible maneuvering you can hurl you own force on only a part, and that the weakest part, of your enemy and crush it. Such tactics will win every time, and a small army may thus destroy a large one in detail, and repeated victory will make it invincible.

I believe Jackson never faced a force the size Early had to on his own. As a part of the Army of Northern Virginia under Johnston and Lee he did, but as a part of the Army of Northern Virginia he was also working with a large force than he did in the Valley. Against Sheridan towards the end of the war I don't think Jackson could have destroyed Sheridan as his tactics would allow. BUT I think he would have used his tactics against Sheridan and Sheridan would not have destroyed him either. More Sheridan would have likely tied Jackson up in the Valley to keep him from possibly linking with Lee. Not that Jackson would have been willing to give the Valley up to Sheridan.

 Close Window