View single post by MildMan
 Posted: Tue Sep 3rd, 2013 05:06 pm
 PM  Quote  Reply  Full Topic 
Just Testing Ideas

Joined: Wed Jul 23rd, 2008
Posts: 93

  back to top

I find it interesting that Lincoln was slow to emancipate slaves. Yes, I understand his point that he lacked the authority to do so. But was that a convenient excuse? If slaves were property, couldn't property of those in rebellion be confiscated? By the spring and summer of 1862 many slaves were freeing themselves by escaping to union lines, particularly on the Pennisula of Virginia. I don't think these ex slaves were sent back to thier former owners. So was the emancipation proclamation just a reflection of what was already occuring?

 Close Window