Civil War Interactive Discussion Board Home
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register

New estimate made of Civil War dead - Civil War News/ Press Releases - Civil War Talk - Civil War Interactive Discussion Board
 Moderated by: javal1
 New Topic   Reply   Printer Friendly 
 Rate Topic 
 Posted: Thu Sep 22nd, 2011 07:37 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
1st Post
Michael F. Blake

Joined: Fri May 7th, 2010
Posts: 82

  back to top

New estimate made of Civil War dead

BINGHAMTON, N.Y., Sep 21, 2011 (UPI via COMTEX) -- An analysis of historic census figures reveals the death toll in the U.S. Civil War was higher than previously estimated, a historian says.

J. David Hacker of Binghamton University in New York says the war's dead numbered about 750,000, an estimate 20 percent higher than the commonly cited figure of 620,000, a university release reported Wednesday.

Many historians agree the 620,000 estimate is flawed, as neither the Union nor the Confederacy kept standardized personnel records.

"There are also huge problems estimating mortality with census data," Hacker said. "You can track the number of people of certain ages from one census to the next, and you can see how many are missing," but people are routinely undercounted, he said.

In his analysis of census data, Hacker looked at the ratio of male survival relative to female survival and established a "normal" pattern in survival rates by looking at the numbers for 1850-1860 and 1870-1880.

Then he compared the war decade, 1860-1870, to the pattern to come up with his estimate of 750,000.

Pulitzer Prize-winner James McPherson, a pre-eminent Civil War historian, says the new figure should gain acceptance among researchers of the era.

"An accurate tally -- or at least a reasonable estimate -- is important in order to gauge the huge impact of the war on American society," he says. "Even if the number of war dead was 'only' 620,000, that still created a huge impact, especially in the South, and a figure of 750,000 makes that impact -- and the demographic shadow it threw on the next two generations of Americans -- just that much greater."

 Posted: Thu Sep 22nd, 2011 09:57 pm
   PM  Quote  Reply 
2nd Post
Root Beer Lover

Joined: Tue Nov 15th, 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 964

  back to top

But how does he know that's correct? Folks moved away after the war, which could possibly account for the difference in census records for one. Though by checking census records of the countries folks may have moved to that would further back up the census data. My concern is less the census records and more the possibility that even that number is low.

 Posted: Tue Dec 27th, 2011 01:36 am
   PM  Quote  Reply 
3rd Post

Joined: Wed Feb 10th, 2010
Location: South Carolina USA
Posts: 212

  back to top

to put that into perspective that would be 411 men dying every day for 5 years, compare that to the 287 americans that died every day during WWII

 Current time is 11:11 pm

UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.1201 seconds (8% database + 92% PHP). 25 queries executed.