Civil War Interactive Discussion Board Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register


 Moderated by: javal1
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Speilberg at Gettysburg  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Sat Oct 6th, 2012 10:12 pm
  PM Quote Reply
1st Post
Michael F. Blake
Member
 

Joined: Fri May 7th, 2010
Location:  
Posts: 82
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Director Steven Speilberg will be the guest speaker at the 149th anniversary of the Gettysburg address.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sun Oct 7th, 2012 05:47 am
  PM Quote Reply
2nd Post
Hellcat
Person


Joined: Tue Nov 15th, 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 680
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Not a big surprise, given what's coming out around then (ten days before the 149th anniversary in fact).

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Thu Oct 11th, 2012 07:56 pm
  PM Quote Reply
3rd Post
philly rabbit
Member


Joined: Sat Oct 6th, 2012
Location:  
Posts: 2
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I wonder how much of a fair shake the south will get in this new film?

I'm not too optimistic.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Oct 12th, 2012 01:35 am
  PM Quote Reply
4th Post
Mark
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 30th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 434
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I wouldn't worry too much rabbit. My understanding is that the movie is primarily about the initial push to adopt the 13th Amendment. The Confederacy had little to say about the matter until the war was over... and even then they really didn't have much of a choice! The movie will almost certainly focus on war opposition in the North.

Mark

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Fri Oct 12th, 2012 06:29 am
  PM Quote Reply
5th Post
Hellcat
Person


Joined: Tue Nov 15th, 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 680
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I haven't seen a Spielberg movie set in the era, but then that's me (you watch me be wrong and I have seen one). I don't know if he directed Gangs of New York or if that was someone else. Probably check out IMDb and find out. But to my knowledge Spielberg hasn't directed movies set earlier than the 20th century. So I have no clue how he'll approach the South concerning the war.

Edit: Well, I was wrong about movies set earlier than the 20th century. Amistad was the 1830s, though I've never seen it.

Last edited on Fri Oct 12th, 2012 06:33 am by Hellcat

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Fri Oct 12th, 2012 12:19 pm
  PM Quote Reply
6th Post
Mark
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 30th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 434
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Hellcat wrote:
I haven't seen a Spielberg movie set in the era, but then that's me (you watch me be wrong and I have seen one). I don't know if he directed Gangs of New York or if that was someone else. Probably check out IMDb and find out. But to my knowledge Spielberg hasn't directed movies set earlier than the 20th century. So I have no clue how he'll approach the South concerning the war.

Edit: Well, I was wrong about movies set earlier than the 20th century. Amistad was the 1830s, though I've never seen it.


Amistad was brilliant! You really should go see it!

Mark

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat Oct 13th, 2012 05:21 am
  PM Quote Reply
7th Post
Hellcat
Person


Joined: Tue Nov 15th, 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 680
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
But my point is still there, Mark. I haven't seen Amistad so I don't know how Spielberg may have portrayed the South in that movie. And how much more had things chanced between the Amistad case and the start of the war? I mean this isn't like Raiders of the Lost Ark to The Last Crusade where the time difference is two years. Looking it up the Amistad case was 1841, twenty years before the start of the war. And the decision in the case is just five days shy of twenty years before when Lincoln was sworn in (the decision was handed down March 9, 1841). How differently might Spielberg portray the South in Lincoln from how he might have portrayed it in Amistad if he portrayed it at all in Amistad?

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Oct 13th, 2012 08:29 pm
  PM Quote Reply
8th Post
Mark
Member
 

Joined: Mon Mar 30th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 434
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
I understand your concern. I'm just saying that if I understand the premise of the Lincoln movie correctly based on everything I have seen, it will be focusing on the fight to ratify the 13th Amendment in the North (though I hate wikipedia with a passion, their plot summary of the film is where I got most of my information http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln_(2012_film) ). I think the Hampton Roads Peace Conference will be about the only place where you'll even see a Southerner... Anyway, I could be completely off my rocker. I guess we will have to wait another month or so.

But seriously, do go see Amistad. You won't regret it (unless you are a Martin Van Buren fan--he comes off as weak and vacillating).

Mark

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Wed Nov 14th, 2012 08:03 am
  PM Quote Reply
9th Post
elrichbach
Member
 

Joined: Wed Nov 14th, 2012
Location:  
Posts: 5
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Spielberg is good and I can't make some negative comments since the movie is good and really make sense.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

Current time is 04:43 am  
Civil War Interactive Discussion Board > Civil War Talk > General Civil War Talk > Speilberg at Gettysburg Top



Lead Theme By: Di @ UltraBB
UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.2889 seconds (13% database + 87% PHP). 26 queries executed.